Difference between revisions of "Template talk:News"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Another screenjabber review: new section) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Sounds like a good idea. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT) | : Sounds like a good idea. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
::I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT) | ::I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT) | ||
== Another screenjabber review == | |||
I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. [http://www.screenjabber.com/futurama_wildgreenyonderDVD It's here.] There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:36, 24 December 2008
News is more important than new Infosphere pages. Perhaps as old items are dropped, they could be added to a News Archive? Thoughts? --Buddy 15:42, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- Sounds like a good idea. --SvipTalk 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - Quolnok 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
Another screenjabber review
I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. It's here. There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --Buddy 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)